GALLELAWBLOGGER

  CLICK TO  READ 

Historical Development of Default Procedure in Partition Proceedings.   The treatment of default in partition proceedings cannot be properly understood unless it is placed within its legislative history. Before statutory partition was introduced, the right of a co-owner to seek division of common property was rooted in the general law, including Roman-Dutch principles. But the old law was not supported by a detailed procedural machinery specially designed for partition. Once the legislature entered the field, it did so because co-ownership had become a practical evil requiring a statutory remedy.   The earliest statutory intervention was Ordinance No. 21 of 1844. Its preamble is of great historical value, for it disclosed the very mischief which moved the legislature. It recognized that “the undivided possession of landed property is productive of very injurious consequences to the inhabitants of this Colony” and that it was “expedient to provide a remedy for the same in c...

 The doctrine of constructive trust occupies a singular and enduring position within the legal system of Sri Lanka. It stands not merely as a technical branch of property law, but as one of the clearest manifestations of the judicial conscience operating within the administration of justice. The doctrine emerged from the ancient equitable principle that no person ought to enrich himself at the expense of another, and that the law, when confronted with fraud, abuse of confidence, or unconscionable conduct, must look beyond the outward form of transactions to discover their true substance. In this manner, the Courts gradually developed the principle that legal ownership and beneficial ownership are not always identical, and that the holder of the legal title may, in appropriate circumstances, be compelled by equity to hold the property for the benefit of another. The historical foundations of constructive trust may be traced to Roman law and the principles governing obligations aris...